Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10739/813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKanwar, Vik-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-22T16:17:51Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-22T16:17:51Z-
dc.date.issued2015-12-31-
dc.identifier.citationKanwar, Vik. (2015). Fugitive from the camp of the conquerors: the revival of equal sovereignty doctrine in Shelby County V. Holder. Berkeley Journal of African-American Law & Policy, Vol.16 No.2: 272-312.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1086-6620-
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=bjalp-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10739/813-
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shelby County v. Holder belongs to the second of these contending narratives.12 The Court attempts to give expression to a cause that has not been able to succeed either on the battlefield or through popular representation, and found only fleeting support in constitutional doctrine. At the time the VRA was passed, it made sense, from a legislative point of view, to focus on “bad actors” (through a Section 4 “coverage formula”) and to put a burden on these proven offenders to demonstrate their proposed laws would not discriminate.en_US
dc.formattexten_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of California, New Yorken_US
dc.subjectShelby County v. Holderen_US
dc.subjectConstitutional Provisionsen_US
dc.subjectQuasi -Constitutional Argumentsen_US
dc.titleFugitive from the camp of the conquerors: the revival of equal sovereignty doctrine in Shelby County V. Holderen_US
dc.typejournal-articleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationJGLS-
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.15779/Z38B90W-
dc.rightproprietaryen_US
Appears in Collections:JGU Research Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Fugitive from the Camp.pdf552.49 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.