Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Green courts: The way forward?
Authors: Chaturvedi, Eeshan
Keywords: Environmental Law
Green Courts
Specialized Courts
Climate Change
Issue Date: 6-Feb-2017
Publisher: Cornell Policy Review
Citation: Chaturvedi, E. (February 06, 2017). Green courts: The way forward?. Cornell Policy Review
Abstract: This paper analyzes the viability of having green courts with dedicated environmental jurisdiction, separate from the general judicial system. In doing so, an effort has been made to take the National Green Tribunal (NGT) of India as a reference point for discussing the advantages and disadvantages of green courts. While acknowledging that both pros and cons of green courts may not specifically overlap with those of specialized courts, there are certain points having reasonable differentia as well as causal nexus between the two sets, given that Environmental Courts form a subset of specialized courts. In this paper, advantages such as expertise, costs of litigation, and expeditiousness have been illustrated with the help of empirical data available in regard to the NGT. Similarly, as a point of comparison, examples from the US administration of justice have been taken to derive a nexus between generalized courts as well as green courts. Though such a comparison between the US judicial system and that of India, in this context, lacks the substantive nature of a natural experiment, the lack of definitive indices for comparison makes a strong case for establishing a relation between the two with the available data. The paper then proceeds to conclude whether green courts, through the analysis, prove to be a feasible system of adjudication.
Appears in Collections:JGU Publications: Popular Articles, Literary items, Opinions, Reviews etc.

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Green Courts_ The Way Forward_.pdfMain Article411.16 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.